64XP-100 wrote:260 Striker wrote:I wonder if a Glock 40 converted to 357 Sig would be any more of an advantage than a stock 357 Sig Glock. Not that either one would be good to use on FP!!!!!
Just to be clear: 357 Sig is not legal in FP due to bottleneck shape.
357 Sig cannot be much worse in ballistics than a 38 Special or target 357 Mag. Not everyone shoots 22 Hornet in FP.
Any more the bottleneck restriction seems bizarre, given that .22 H, 25-20, even .32-20, and now .300 BO have been deemed acceptable. Why not include 256 WM and .22 TCM, IF they won't damage targets. Mind you, I flail away still with a .44 Mag revolver or three, mostly because it shoots better for me than any Contender, and I have yet to find a .22 H BF to try.
