Hello, the fire,
I reckon it's been discussed before. I'm looking a building a range on my place for practice and maybe someday matches.
Is it permissible to "stack" (or maybe alternate depth/height is a better word) small bore targets?
I'm wanting to make the ram line a bit shorter than what distance 10 in a straight row takes up. That way we can have more than 10 targets on a narrow bank.
I'm pondering a set up like this. First 5 rams at 101 yds. Second 5 rams at 100 yds.
The first five would appear to be above the second five.
And the second 5 would be lower and just a tad closer.
It would look like this from the firing line.
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10
I didn't see a problem with that as long as the rams didn't topple each other when falling over from a shot.
Please let me know if it's been done successfully. Or IHMSA-legal.
Much obliged,
Mustang Gregg
#17040
Possible target placement (new range question)
- Mustang Gregg
- Target Painter
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 12:08 pm
- IHMSA Member#: 17040
- Location: Nebrsaka
- Contact:
Possible target placement (new range question)
"I have two guns. One for each of you."
- Mustang Gregg
- Target Painter
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 12:08 pm
- IHMSA Member#: 17040
- Location: Nebrsaka
- Contact:
Re: Possible target placement (new range question)
Aw crap. The forum system took the spaces out of the last post I put up.
I wanted to make the ram line to look more like this:
..1....2....3....4....5....
....6....7....8....9....10.
Maybe this will work. I don't see how to edit a post.
Thx,
MG
I wanted to make the ram line to look more like this:
..1....2....3....4....5....
....6....7....8....9....10.
Maybe this will work. I don't see how to edit a post.
Thx,
MG
"I have two guns. One for each of you."
- 35isit
- State Director
- Posts: 853
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 9:36 am
- IHMSA Member#: 36827
- Location: Central Ky
- Contact:
Re: Possible target placement (new range question)
I don't see a problem with it. It is hard to tell but in the picture on the banner above but most of the half scale and fifth scale targets are at slightly different distances from each other. In my opinion just remember there is a definite 1 through 10 and must be shot in order.
Greg
Life Member of N.R.A.
80X80 7/27/2010
Ky State Director
Life Member of N.R.A.
80X80 7/27/2010
Ky State Director
- 19 Turkeys
- Class AA
- Posts: 1121
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 12:14 am
- IHMSA Member#: 33287
- Location: S Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Possible target placement (new range question)
The only issue I see is that the shooter must be able to distinguish which targets are one through five and six through ten. You might try the layout to make sure they are distinguishable. I know some ranges actually build racks and stack them one through five on the bottom and six through ten on the top. That way, a target falling off the top rack does not accidentally knock down one on the bottom rack. That may be a better setup for you depending on the topography of your land.
Steve W.
Steve W.
Past Match Director, JCSA - Grants Pass, OR
Past JCSA Board Member
IHMSA Life Member
Past Editor IHMSA News
Past Manager of IHMSA HQ West
NRA Patron
Due to recent cutbacks the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.
Past JCSA Board Member
IHMSA Life Member
Past Editor IHMSA News
Past Manager of IHMSA HQ West
NRA Patron
Due to recent cutbacks the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.
- Mustang Gregg
- Target Painter
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 12:08 pm
- IHMSA Member#: 17040
- Location: Nebrsaka
- Contact:
Re: Possible target placement (new range question)
19 Turkeys:
Well, I did a little playing and stacking here. I was pondering doing this only with small bore rams. Not chickens, pigs or turkeys.
My plan was to have one yard of linear range distance between the rows. Like 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 set at 101 yds. And 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 set at 100 yds.
The 1-5 row would be a full 36" higher too.
And 1 was further left than 6. So you could (should) not get mixed up as to which is the first row of targets to shoot.
I reckon that a .22 bullet will not move a ram far enough to disturb the front or rear row.
I will test the theory when I can. I have a nice draw with a 60 ft rise behind it for a safety area. Lots of trees on each side and beyond.
Mustang Gregg
Well, I did a little playing and stacking here. I was pondering doing this only with small bore rams. Not chickens, pigs or turkeys.
My plan was to have one yard of linear range distance between the rows. Like 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 set at 101 yds. And 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 set at 100 yds.
The 1-5 row would be a full 36" higher too.
And 1 was further left than 6. So you could (should) not get mixed up as to which is the first row of targets to shoot.
I reckon that a .22 bullet will not move a ram far enough to disturb the front or rear row.
I will test the theory when I can. I have a nice draw with a 60 ft rise behind it for a safety area. Lots of trees on each side and beyond.
Mustang Gregg
"I have two guns. One for each of you."
- Richard Pickering
- Class B
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 10:56 am
- IHMSA Member#: 5905
- Location: Stone Mountain, Ga
Re: Possible target placement (new range question)
Gregg this format is in place at the Conover, NC range. It works well. You do have to get a mental picture of where the targets are so you dont lose them; especially with scoped guns and half scale targets. rp
I have served as assistant match director, Southern Silhouette club, 1980s. Also, the Griffin Gun Club for Silhouette during the 1990s, to about 2005. For a short period I authored the ''Cast Bullet'' section of The IHMSA News. Joined IHMSA March 1979.