Page 1 of 2

Re: 2013 FINANCIAL Report

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 11:17 am
by 19 Turkeys
Thanks for posting that Dan. Hopefully, the 2014 statement will show improvement.

Yours,

Steve W.

Re: 2013 FINANCIAL Report

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 7:01 pm
by Shoot2Thrill
Could someone please explain IHMSA news? It looks like $400 was brought in for subscriptions in 2013 and about $700 in 2012, but it costs thousands to send the news and print it.

Re: 2013 FINANCIAL Report

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 7:08 pm
by hardtoseeovergut
Shoot2Thrill wrote:Could someone please explain IHMSA news? It looks like $400 was brought in for subscriptions in 2013 and about $700 in 2012, but it costs thousands to send the news and print it.
That's why its electronic now

Re: 2013 FINANCIAL Report

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 8:24 pm
by nutcase
Shoot2Thrill wrote:Could someone please explain IHMSA news? It looks like $400 was brought in for subscriptions in 2013 and about $700 in 2012, but it costs thousands to send the news and print it.
you forgot that part of your membership dues goes to printing the IHMSA news.

and yes, that is why we are going electronic for the news. to cut down costs.

Re: 2013 FINANCIAL Report

Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 9:22 pm
by Proclaim
Why does the report have a 'hand written plus sign on the Net Income line? The income was $64,615.17 and the expenses were $78,592.58 so the Net Income should be a negative $13,977.41.

Re: 2013 FINANCIAL Report

Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 9:49 pm
by nutcase
Proclaim wrote:Why does the report have a 'hand written plus sign on the Net Income line? The income was $64,615.17 and the expenses were $78,592.58 so the Net Income should be a negative $13,977.41.
that is how I got it!

Re: 2013 FINANCIAL Report

Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:39 pm
by Proclaim
nutcase wrote:
Proclaim wrote:Why does the report have a 'hand written plus sign on the Net Income line? The income was $64,615.17 and the expenses were $78,592.58 so the Net Income should be a negative $13,977.41.
that is how I got it!
Who did you get it from?

Re: 2013 FINANCIAL Report

Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:41 pm
by nutcase
Proclaim wrote:
nutcase wrote:
Proclaim wrote:Why does the report have a 'hand written plus sign on the Net Income line? The income was $64,615.17 and the expenses were $78,592.58 so the Net Income should be a negative $13,977.41.
that is how I got it!
Who did you get it from?
it came from HQ. who did it, not sure

Re: 2013 FINANCIAL Report

Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:54 pm
by 260 Striker
So I see the deltas from several years but still don't have a clue what our current balance is. What is the balance as of 31 December 2014 or the last annual meeting? Whichever date the annual books are closed.

Re: 2013 FINANCIAL Report

Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:59 pm
by nutcase
260 Striker wrote:So I see the deltas from several years but still don't have a clue what our current balance is. What is the balance as of 31 December 2014 or the last annual meeting? Whichever date the annual books are closed.
I am hoping it is on the 2014 financials which I have not received yet. They should be done soon