Re: 2013 FINANCIAL Report
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 11:17 am
Thanks for posting that Dan. Hopefully, the 2014 statement will show improvement.
Yours,
Steve W.
Yours,
Steve W.
That's why its electronic nowShoot2Thrill wrote:Could someone please explain IHMSA news? It looks like $400 was brought in for subscriptions in 2013 and about $700 in 2012, but it costs thousands to send the news and print it.
you forgot that part of your membership dues goes to printing the IHMSA news.Shoot2Thrill wrote:Could someone please explain IHMSA news? It looks like $400 was brought in for subscriptions in 2013 and about $700 in 2012, but it costs thousands to send the news and print it.
that is how I got it!Proclaim wrote:Why does the report have a 'hand written plus sign on the Net Income line? The income was $64,615.17 and the expenses were $78,592.58 so the Net Income should be a negative $13,977.41.
Who did you get it from?nutcase wrote:that is how I got it!Proclaim wrote:Why does the report have a 'hand written plus sign on the Net Income line? The income was $64,615.17 and the expenses were $78,592.58 so the Net Income should be a negative $13,977.41.
it came from HQ. who did it, not sureProclaim wrote:Who did you get it from?nutcase wrote:that is how I got it!Proclaim wrote:Why does the report have a 'hand written plus sign on the Net Income line? The income was $64,615.17 and the expenses were $78,592.58 so the Net Income should be a negative $13,977.41.
I am hoping it is on the 2014 financials which I have not received yet. They should be done soon260 Striker wrote:So I see the deltas from several years but still don't have a clue what our current balance is. What is the balance as of 31 December 2014 or the last annual meeting? Whichever date the annual books are closed.