Just wondering why the 256 Mag isn't legal for FP? Not much difference in performance between it and the 30 carbine or 32-20, which are both legal. Sure it isn't a straight walled case, but it was developed as a pistol round and was orginally offered in a gun that would definately be FP legal (the Ruger Hawkeye).
I think the 256 Mag should be legal for FP.
What say you?
Why not the 256?
-
- Target Setter
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 4:14 pm
- IHMSA Member#: 57133
- Boomer
- Site Admin
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:54 pm
- IHMSA Member#: 57468
- Location: Northern KY
- Contact:
Re: Why not the 256?
Sure... Why not...
If the 22 Hornet counts as a FP cartridge then I think an argument could be made for very nearly any cartridge...
If the 22 Hornet counts as a FP cartridge then I think an argument could be made for very nearly any cartridge...
Regards,
Bob
NRA Life
IHMSA Life
Bob
NRA Life
IHMSA Life
- 19 Turkeys
- Class AA
- Posts: 1096
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 12:14 am
- IHMSA Member#: 33287
- Location: S Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Why not the 256?
Write a rule change & submit it. The procedure is in the rule book.
Steve W.
Steve W.
Past Match Director, JCSA - Grants Pass, OR
Past JCSA Board Member
IHMSA Life Member
Past Editor IHMSA News
Past Manager of IHMSA HQ West
NRA Patron
Due to recent cutbacks the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.
Past JCSA Board Member
IHMSA Life Member
Past Editor IHMSA News
Past Manager of IHMSA HQ West
NRA Patron
Due to recent cutbacks the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.
- Mustang Gregg
- Target Painter
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 12:08 pm
- IHMSA Member#: 17040
- Location: Nebrsaka
- Contact:
Re: Why not the 256?
I know it ain't really a parallel, but it seems like we used .256 WM (in 10" T/C's) in NRA Hunter Pistol. Also used were .22Jet, .32-20, .25-20, .30 Carb (as long as there was no target damge). But maybe we were just too easy on the rules.
Just saying----
Mustang Gregg
Just saying----
Mustang Gregg
"I have two guns. One for each of you."
-
- Target Setter
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:44 am
- IHMSA Member#: 0
- Contact:
Re: Why not the 256?
Can we able to change the rule?Write a rule change & submit it. The procedure is in the rule book.
-
- Target Setter
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 4:41 pm
- IHMSA Member#: 0
Re: Why not the 256?
When was the last time you saw a Ruger .256 Hawkeye?HandgunHTR wrote:Just wondering why the 256 Mag isn't legal for FP? Not much difference in performance between it and the 30 carbine or 32-20, which are both legal. Sure it isn't a straight walled case, but it was developed as a pisto
l round and was orginally offered in a gun that would definately be FP legal (the Ruger Hawkeye).
I think the 256 Mag should be legal for FP.
What say you?
Just saying...
- 260 Striker
- Class AA
- Posts: 1623
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:41 pm
- IHMSA Member#: 0
- Location: DeGraff, OH
Re: Why not the 256?
Bucks O, I'm pretty sure this was meant for a TC Contender. This would be a natural since the 25-20 is already legal. The bottle neck rule for FP is not really valid anymore since there are already several bottle neck cartridges in use for FP. A more sensible rule needs to be written to limit FP to lower powered cartridges but then again I would consider a 44mag lower powered!!! How about the 218 Bee while we are at it!! K-Hornet anyone? Even 357 Sig. Lots of older cartridges that would work well for FP.
Lynn Shultz
IHMSA #15692 since 1980
Past Match Director Logan Handgun Association
Current VP Logan Handgun Association
NRA Member
United States Air Force Veteran
Retired USAF Civil Servant (47 years)
937-407-4885
IHMSA #15692 since 1980
Past Match Director Logan Handgun Association
Current VP Logan Handgun Association
NRA Member
United States Air Force Veteran
Retired USAF Civil Servant (47 years)
937-407-4885
- 19 Turkeys
- Class AA
- Posts: 1096
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 12:14 am
- IHMSA Member#: 33287
- Location: S Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Why not the 256?
Write a rule change and submit it Lynn.260 Striker wrote:Bucks O, I'm pretty sure this was meant for a TC Contender. This would be a natural since the 25-20 is already legal. The bottle neck rule for FP is not really valid anymore since there are already several bottle neck cartridges in use for FP. A more sensible rule needs to be written to limit FP to lower powered cartridges but then again I would consider a 44mag lower powered!!! How about the 218 Bee while we are at it!! K-Hornet anyone? Even 357 Sig. Lots of older cartridges that would work well for FP.
Steve W.
Past Match Director, JCSA - Grants Pass, OR
Past JCSA Board Member
IHMSA Life Member
Past Editor IHMSA News
Past Manager of IHMSA HQ West
NRA Patron
Due to recent cutbacks the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.
Past JCSA Board Member
IHMSA Life Member
Past Editor IHMSA News
Past Manager of IHMSA HQ West
NRA Patron
Due to recent cutbacks the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.
- 260 Striker
- Class AA
- Posts: 1623
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:41 pm
- IHMSA Member#: 0
- Location: DeGraff, OH
Re: Why not the 256?
Steve and others, I just submitted a proposal to HQ to change Section VII: Cartridges, C. Field Pistol Cartridges, Item 2 to read as follows.
------------------------------
Any bottle neck cartridge with a maximum case length of 1.403 inches, as specified for that cartridge. NOTE: The .221 Fireball cartridge is excluded and is NOT legal for Field Pistol.
------------------------------
This change would allow 256 Mag, 22 K-Hornet, 357 Sig, 38-40, 44-40 and other old time cartridges that would be perfect for FP and still allow the current 270 REN, 32-20, 22 Hornet and 25-20. The current rule book does NOT include the 25-20 so this change would also allow it although it has already been used in FP.
Now if I can just find someone to make me a Contender barrel in 5.7X28 FN!!!!!!!!
Just have to wait and see what happens.
------------------------------
Any bottle neck cartridge with a maximum case length of 1.403 inches, as specified for that cartridge. NOTE: The .221 Fireball cartridge is excluded and is NOT legal for Field Pistol.
------------------------------
This change would allow 256 Mag, 22 K-Hornet, 357 Sig, 38-40, 44-40 and other old time cartridges that would be perfect for FP and still allow the current 270 REN, 32-20, 22 Hornet and 25-20. The current rule book does NOT include the 25-20 so this change would also allow it although it has already been used in FP.
Now if I can just find someone to make me a Contender barrel in 5.7X28 FN!!!!!!!!
Just have to wait and see what happens.
Lynn Shultz
IHMSA #15692 since 1980
Past Match Director Logan Handgun Association
Current VP Logan Handgun Association
NRA Member
United States Air Force Veteran
Retired USAF Civil Servant (47 years)
937-407-4885
IHMSA #15692 since 1980
Past Match Director Logan Handgun Association
Current VP Logan Handgun Association
NRA Member
United States Air Force Veteran
Retired USAF Civil Servant (47 years)
937-407-4885
- 19 Turkeys
- Class AA
- Posts: 1096
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 12:14 am
- IHMSA Member#: 33287
- Location: S Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Why not the 256?
Good job Lynn!
Steve W.
Steve W.
Past Match Director, JCSA - Grants Pass, OR
Past JCSA Board Member
IHMSA Life Member
Past Editor IHMSA News
Past Manager of IHMSA HQ West
NRA Patron
Due to recent cutbacks the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.
Past JCSA Board Member
IHMSA Life Member
Past Editor IHMSA News
Past Manager of IHMSA HQ West
NRA Patron
Due to recent cutbacks the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.