Practical Hunter Rules Proposal

Questions about, disagreements with or ideas for new rules post here.
User avatar United States of America
high standard 40
Class A
Posts: 657
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:08 am
IHMSA Member#: 11568

Re: Practical Hunter Rules Proposal

Post by high standard 40 »

nutcase wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 4:02 pm Ok, I have a couple of things that need discussion.

First, We keep wanting to add more categories to try to accommodate older shooters. As it stands now, we have 29 different categories between BB,SB, FP, Air, PH and U500! if we want to add more categories, it may be time to start deleting other categories.

Second, Why is it we are never trying to attract new shooters? I think it may be too late as talking to some new shooters, The biggest detractor is we have too many Categories! Younger shooters are still on limited budgets and still raising a Family. They have limited resources to spend on sports like ours. This many categories scare them away to other shooting sports.

But, without new shooters, this sport will eventually die.

I have nothing against adding a scoped revolver catregory, but we need to remove other categories to accomodate the new categories.

and now, I found a mistake on the Air pistol score card, USIS is missing! :-o :-o
I'm not sure where I stand on all of this. I do agree that 29 categories is a lot, and adding to that number may not be a good thing. I can make a suggestion. Three of the most recently added categories are Practical Hunter. We could easily combine Big Bore UAS and PHLC and also combine Smallbore UAS with PH22. There is functionally little difference in those categories anyway and a simple tweaking of the rules can combine them. I'd strongly like to keep PHSC because it fills a niche that did not previously exist. It give a shooter the ability to shoot a freestyle centerfire gun on a 100 yard range. In fact, PHSC is one of the most popular categories at my home range. This step would open up room for the red dot categories in Big Bore and Smallbore without adding to the total IHMSA category count. One thing is for sure, we do need to find a way to attract and keep shooters, not exclude them.
IHMSA Member since 1980
Former Match Director Baton Rouge Silhouette Club
Current Match Director Ascension Silhouette
Current Match Director Saline Creek Silhouette
Current Match Director Top Shot Silhouette
NRA Life Member
NRA Range Safety Officer
User avatar United States of America
nutcase
Site Admin
Posts: 936
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 4:44 pm
IHMSA Member#: 42084
Location: Yuma, AZ

Re: Practical Hunter Rules Proposal

Post by nutcase »

JACKIE40X40 wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 5:27 pm
nutcase wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 4:02 pm Ok, I have a couple of things that need discussion.

First, We keep wanting to add more categories to try to accommodate older shooters. As it stands now, we have 29 different categories between BB,SB, FP, Air, PH and U500! if we want to add more categories, it may be time to start deleting other categories.

Second, Why is it we are never trying to attract new shooters? I think it may be too late as talking to some new shooters, The biggest detractor is we have too many Categories! Younger shooters are still on limited budgets and still raising a Family. They have limited resources to spend on sports like ours. This many categories scare them away to other shooting sports.

But, without new shooters, this sport will eventually die.

I have nothing against adding a scoped revolver catregory, but we need to remove other categories to accomodate the new categories.

and now, I found a mistake on the Air pistol score card, USIS is missing! :-o :-o
No biggie,can’t it be hand written on the cards?
it has never been there on the 40rd card. just will take a little work for me to add it.
Daniel Hagerty
IHMSA # 42084L
IHMSA News Editor - 2015-2017
.22 records Coordinator - Present
CA State Director - 2015-2019
Match Director, Stockton Silhouette club 1990-1995
NRA Patriot Endowment Life Member
User avatar United States of America
64XP-100
Spotter
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 7:27 pm
IHMSA Member#: 57733
Location: Eastern PA
Contact:

Re: Practical Hunter Rules Proposal

Post by 64XP-100 »

PHSC => FPUAS ?
Pat Camus
Eastern PA @ Falls Township or Wilkes-Barre
NRA-Endowment Member
United States of America
braud357
Class A
Posts: 652
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 7:56 am
IHMSA Member#: 13794
Location: Gonzales, LA

Re: Practical Hunter Rules Proposal

Post by braud357 »

Every new category that is being suggested already has a category that will accommodate these shooters/ guns/optics ! No need to reinvent the wheel - put these shooters on the line, and let them shoot !
IHMSA # 13794 Joined May, 1980
Match Director Ascension Silhouette Gonzales, LA 1991-2009
Louisiana IHMSA Deputy State Director 1983 - 1985
Louisiana IHMSA State Director 1995 - 2007, 2014 -
IHMSA Region 2 Director 2007 - 2009
Life Member - NRA
United States of America
braud357
Class A
Posts: 652
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 7:56 am
IHMSA Member#: 13794
Location: Gonzales, LA

Re: Practical Hunter Rules Proposal

Post by braud357 »

64XP-100 wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 6:50 am PHSC => FPUAS ?
Only difference is that Field Pistol is a standing category - PH is freestyle !
IHMSA # 13794 Joined May, 1980
Match Director Ascension Silhouette Gonzales, LA 1991-2009
Louisiana IHMSA Deputy State Director 1983 - 1985
Louisiana IHMSA State Director 1995 - 2007, 2014 -
IHMSA Region 2 Director 2007 - 2009
Life Member - NRA
United States of America
260 Striker
Class AA
Posts: 1623
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:41 pm
IHMSA Member#: 0
Location: DeGraff, OH

Re: Practical Hunter Rules Proposal

Post by 260 Striker »

I think this discussion has gotten away from the original suggestion. Just let the dot sights and maybe 1.5X optics in the Production and Revolver categories. Don't need new categories. Just go back to Jim's original suggestion. Do we want to make rules more simple or more complicated????? Pretty soon we are going to have our organization regulated out of business and scare off any potential new shooters. Keep things simple!!!
Lynn Shultz
IHMSA #15692 since 1980
Past Match Director Logan Handgun Association
Current VP Logan Handgun Association
NRA Member
United States Air Force Veteran
Retired USAF Civil Servant (47 years)
937-407-4885
User avatar United States of America
JACKIE40X40
Class A
Posts: 505
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 11:12 am
IHMSA Member#: 13263
Location: Moore Oklahoma

Re: Practical Hunter Rules Proposal

Post by JACKIE40X40 »

260 Striker wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 11:42 am I think this discussion has gotten away from the original suggestion. Just let the dot sights and maybe 1.5X optics in the Production and Revolver categories. Don't need new categories. Just go back to Jim's original suggestion. Do we want to make rules more simple or more complicated????? Pretty soon we are going to have our organization regulated out of business and scare off any potential new shooters. Keep things simple!!! I second that!
United States of America
bkraft
Target Painter
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:27 pm
IHMSA Member#: 57644

Re: Practical Hunter Rules Proposal

Post by bkraft »

What 260 Striker said!
User avatar United States of America
JACKIE40X40
Class A
Posts: 505
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 11:12 am
IHMSA Member#: 13263
Location: Moore Oklahoma

Re: Practical Hunter Rules Proposal

Post by JACKIE40X40 »

JACKIE40X40 wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 12:17 pm
260 Striker wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 11:42 am I think this discussion has gotten away from the original suggestion. Just let the dot sights and maybe 1.5X optics in the Production and Revolver categories. Don't need new categories. Just go back to Jim's original suggestion. Do we want to make rules more simple or more complicated????? Pretty soon we are going to have our organization regulated out of business and scare off any potential new shooters. Keep things simple!!!
I second that!
United States of America
bkraft
Target Painter
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:27 pm
IHMSA Member#: 57644

Re: Practical Hunter Rules Proposal

Post by bkraft »

So, where do we go from here?
Post Reply